あとありがちなのが、ESTPなんかのプレイヤーが人事やりたいとか言い出すやつ こういうのは勘違いが多くて圧迫面接とかパワハラとかやらかす 共感力や感受性が鈍くて自分の要求を押し通すのが得意な人は営業や技能、公安職向き 0545名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 19:43:18.89ID:HPPAdWm4 人事部の話はINFJスレでどうぞ 単にノースキルなのに営業はやりたくないってのが集まる職種やろ たぶんINTJは関心ないと思うで 0546名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 20:01:42.28ID:YxHEuR/E MBTIヲタクマジで気持ちわりーな 論理風の妄想で考えた気になれるとかお目出度過ぎだろ 0547名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 20:49:47.14ID:yArTUPzu>>546 論文まだー? 0548他タイプ2020/06/26(金) 22:10:44.48ID:tEkZxJfn ぶっちゃけどの学術でも成果出せなきゃ考えた気になれるだけだぜ 0549名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 23:20:22.85ID:bSFWpHsw>>547 は? 0550名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 23:27:46.13ID:VPIUB46X ま? 0551他タイプ2020/06/26(金) 23:28:19.46ID:tEkZxJfn は?ってなんだよこいつ 自分で文の意味考えれないのかな 0552名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 23:28:36.27ID:+t47lYsr ず? 0553名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 23:28:50.39ID:VPIUB46X ぐ? 0554他タイプ2020/06/26(金) 23:31:00.95ID:tEkZxJfn はまずぐってなんだよもう 自分で考えれないから教えろよもう 0555名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 23:33:31.76ID:VPIUB46X はまずぐ【はもずく】[幻] 1東北のもずく 南方のものより少し太めでこりこりした食感 2 浜辺ではくゴム底の運動靴 浜ズック。 0556名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 23:36:54.62ID:bSFWpHsw >Over the last 25 years, a number of researchers have investigated the validity of personality measures for personnel selection purposes. The overall conclusion is that the validity of personality as a predictor of job performance is fairly low and probably not much better than the unstructured interview. In general, personality inventories are only modest predictors of diverse measures of job performance across all job families (e.g., managerial, sales, clerical/administrative). However, at the time these validity studies were done, no well-accepted model existed for classifying the diversity of personality traits related to human behavior. As such, it wasn't really possible to determine whether there were consistent and meaningful relationships between particular aspects of personality and performance in different occupations. 0557名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 23:37:24.91ID:bSFWpHsw >Conclusion. Although the MBTI is one of the most commonly used personality instruments used in career and organizational development interventions, the 1991 National Academy of Sciences review committee concluded that: "at this time, there is not sufficient, well-designed research to justify the use of the MBTI in career counseling programs" (page 101). As with all career assessment instruments, practitioners are encouraged to cautiously utilize all assessments in facilitating career planning and decision-making processes with employees. Further critical reviews by Pittenger (2005) and others suggest that the MBTI, while offering much intuitive appeal, may not yet be able to support all the claims its supporters make. Using the MBTI in your individual and organizational interventions may simply come down to whether you are a Thinker (T) or a Feeler (F); either more research is required to really establish the instrument's validity and practical usefulness in organizations or if it seems to be working, why try to fix it?
俺の は? はお前らがソースのない妄想に囚われてるにも関わらず批判に対しては根拠を求めたからね 結局自分の都合のいい情報になるよう取捨選択して判断の根拠を合理化してるだけでしょ君たち 0558名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 23:40:35.63ID:bSFWpHsw >The interesting – and somewhat alarming – fact about the MBTI is that, despite its popularity, it has been subject to sustained criticism by professional psychologists for over three decades. One problem is that it displays what statisticians call low "test-retest reliability." So if you retake the test after only a five-week gap, there's around a 50% chance that you will fall into a different personality category compared to the first time you took the test. A second criticism is that the MBTI mistakenly assumes that personality falls into mutually exclusive categories. ... The consequence is that the scores of two people labelled "introverted" and "extraverted" may be almost exactly the same, but they could be placed into different categories since they fall on either side of an imaginary dividing line.
https://fortune.com/2013/05/15/have-we-all-been-duped-by-the-myers-briggs-test/ 有料記事注意 0559名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 23:44:20.14ID:VPIUB46X 推測だけど547はあなたを別のENTJと思ったため「あなたの論文は書けたのか?」という意味で問うたのでは? 0560名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 23:52:37.62ID:fALTC2CF>>555 唐突で草ァ! 0561名無しを整える。2020/06/26(金) 23:54:10.20ID:bSFWpHsw Jung's typology implies that the attitudes and functions are (a) stable; (b) categorical or qualitatively dichotomous; (c) interacting; and (d) giving rise to different compounds of surface traits. In addition, it implies that type indeterminacy produces ineffective and maladjusted behavior.
A program of studies aimed at assessing these structural properties of Jung's typology was designed and executed, using a self‐report inventory, the Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator. These studies found that (a) the type classifications had moderate temporal stability; (b) Indicator score distributions showed no marked evidence of bimodality; (c) with one exception, the regressions of other variables on Indicator scales did not change in either level or slope at the zero point of the Indicator scales; (d) the Indicator scales did not interact in relation to other variables; (e) the Indicator scales did not moderate the regression of other variables on one another; and (f) type indeterminacy was unrelated to measures of ineffective behavior and maladjustment.
It was concluded that these findings offer little support for any of the structural properties attributed to the typology. Two possible interpretations of these negative findings were suggested: (a) Jung's typology is not consistent with the real world; or (b) the Indicator does not correspond to the theoretical formulation of the typology; that is, the Indicator does not operationally define the typology. Verification of these interpretations awaits further research.